Lloyd Zusman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > from <> drop > > However, the message whose headers appear below is not getting > caught by any of these rules, and a confirmation is attempted to the > address "<>" (in those headers, I changed the my local hostname to > something bogus; the rest of the information is exactly as it > appears in the original message).
Please show us the corresponding LOGFILE_INCOMING entry so we can see what TMDA thought of the message. > Why is the "from" rule above not catching this email? Could it be > due to the name "Sam" in front of the <>? No, because "from" refers to the address in Return-Path, not "From:". _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
