Jason R. Mastaler wrote:
> "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> 
>>0.999999 isn't positive?
> 
> 
> Not positive enough <wink>.

I was always amazed how many people wouldn't touch Postfix because it
hadn't reached "version 1", the argument that vast amounts of IBM and HP
email was being shipped around the globe by the code didn't seem to
register at all.

Anyway I hope the "release" of TMDA 1.0 is as successful.

I guess this means I should upgrade from my archaic version, to one
<sic> that doesn't crash, and lose all those chinese spams, but
correctly replies in case someone really did email me in Big-5 with
badly formatted email.

Thanks to Jason and the team.

I've always been particularly impressed with Jason's patience at
answering email list enquiries, especially those from those of us who
should have known better, or read the FAQ more closely.

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users

Reply via email to