"Ronald F. Guilmette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The use of a "Precedence: bulk" incorrectly indicates to the
> receiving site that TMDA challenge messages are part of the traffic
> of some mailing list whose messages are being delivered to MANY
> different parties.
Where are you quoting from? Can you provide a reference please?
Also, I'm not sure that 'bulk' is reserved for mailing lists only.
AFAIK, there is a "Precedence: list" setting in circulation also.
> TMDA should be fixed to instead generate the header:
>
> Precedence: junk
>
> for all challenge messages.
Some spam filters (albeit broken ones) designate messages containing
"Precedence: junk" as junk-mail, which is why we went with 'bulk'.
> ("junk" is the traditional designation for one-time automatically-
> generated messages, such as those from other kinds of
> autoresponders.)
Again, a reference to the appropriate RFC, etc, would help here.
Thanks.
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
