"Mike Usmar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It maybe of use to someone, or Jason you might want to take these > changes and make something a little bit more usuable be everyone.
I won't be incorporating your patch, because I believe the current behavior of deferring, rather than bouncing the message when encountering a delivery error, is the safe and therefore correct behavior. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
