R & K Weinbender wrote:

> Hi,
> I have tmda 0.91 installed and running from the
> unstable debian package.  It works well.
> *
> I've downloaded _tmda-cgi-0.12.tgz_  but when I
> run   tar -xzf tmda-cgi-0.12.tgz   (as root)
> I get these errors:
> ***************************
> tar: tmda-cgi-0.12/htdocs/display/dyn_buttons/subtopic9.png: Cannot
> change owner
> ship to uid 102725, gid 100: Invalid argument
> tar: tmda-cgi-0.12/htdocs/display/dyn_buttons: Cannot change ownership
> to uid 10
> 2725, gid 100: Invalid argument
> tar: tmda-cgi-0.12/htdocs/display/corner.gif: Cannot change ownership to
> uid 102
> 725, gid 100: Invalid argument
> <snip>
> tar: tmda-cgi-0.12/stubs: Cannot change ownership to uid 102725, gid
> 100: Invali
> d argument
> tar: tmda-cgi-0.12: Cannot change ownership to uid 102725, gid 100:
> Invalid argu
> ment
> tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
> *****************************
> There are many more errors than I listed, but they all have "_Cannot
> change ownership_"
> error in common.
>
> Am I trying to install from the wrong directory?
> Appreciate any help you could give me.
> Thanks,
> -Rick
>

********************************************

Jan Minar wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:25:58AM -0600, Rick Weinbender wrote:
> > "tar: tmda-cgi-0.12/htdocs/display/dyn_buttons/subtopic9.png: Cannot
> > change ownership to uid 102725, gid 100: Invalid argument"
>
> Hi, Rick.
>
> In Linux 2.4, the GIDs (& UIDs too) are 16 bit, i.e. 0 to 2^16 - 1,
> which is 65535.  102725 > 65535.
>
> I guess the error isn't fatal, and the files untar just fine, only the
> group ownership is bogus?
>
> HTH.
> Jan Minar

******************************
> Thanks Jan,
> Are you saying that Debian stable appears
> outdated to this program/process?

Not at all.  The GID value has nothing to do with anything apart from
the number of groups that can coexist at a given time on a given system.

The GID will be bogus anyway, just think about it...

The system requirements/known incompatibilities should be stated in the
app documentation.

What system was the tar packed on, I wonder?
******************************
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 02:22:23PM -0600, Rick Weinbender wrote:
> I've posted to the tmda-users list before I posted
> to the debian-users list, but got no response.
> I checked their archives.  Someone else had basically the
> same problem as mine but, the problem wasn't solved.

> I've just sent my question to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> who is someone more directly involved with the project.

It's not a bug, the UIDs have no meaning on a system other than the
original one.  You should never unpack the UIDs, there is a tar option
for that, rtfm.  If there wasn't it'd be a tar bug.
HTH.
Jan Minar




_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users

Reply via email to