On 2004-02-17, Jason R. Mastaler penned: > "Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Could anyone point me to a document that explains what the >> significance of <> in the Return-path is supposed to be? > > Try http://cr.yp.to/immhf/envelope.html, following the various links > on that page. Also http://cr.yp.to/smtp/mail.html#mail > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html if you really want to get into > the nitty gritty.
Is it then accurate to say that, because the Return-path is used to determine the address to which bounces should be set, an empty (<>) Return-path is used by mailers when they don't want to receive bounces from undeliverable addresses, and that's all there is to it? -- monique _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
