On 2005-03-18, Brian penned: > > Don't get me wrong: I found TMDA to be well-written, well-supported, > excellently documented and very functional. But over time, the utility of > TMDA gradually decreased until there was little return on time invested > keeping TMDA up-to-date, tracking the mailing list, etc.
I don't use the C/R aspect of TMDA, but TMDA is still important to me because it has the easiest filter rule syntax I've encountered. I have a few rules in procmail, mostly ones taken from examples on the web, but for the most part I use tmda to route my mail to the appropriate boxes, interpret SA's headers, etc. -- monique Ask smart questions, get good answers: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([email protected]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
