I would suggest to make options on tmda-pending like we have done with -n which is nomodify not to modify the white/black list since it may happen at times that you want to delete the message but you do not want it on your white or black list.
REMO -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tmda-workers digest, Vol 1 #307 - 2 msgs Send tmda-workers mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of tmda-workers digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Patch to cleanup pending dir (Jason R. Mastaler) 2. Re: Patch to cleanup pending dir (Jason R. Mastaler) --__--__-- Message: 1 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Patch to cleanup pending dir From: "Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 04:47:08 +0300 (EEST) Michael Bleyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As far as I understand it, incoming messages are only checked versus > messages that are still in the dictionary list. So once the message > spills over the dictionary list length limit, there is no reason to > keep the actual file beyond that, or is there one that I have > missed? This is true. Again though, I'm not sure I'm going to keep the DELIVERED_CACHE. I've already envisioned a scenario where this would be replaced with another method, at which point the feature you've provided will be broken, users will bitch & moan, etc. I "learned my lesson" when I broke keyword address compatibility a few releases back, and am trying harder to plan ahead. So, although you're free to use your patch locally, I'm not going to check it in. Thanks for your understanding. --__--__-- Message: 2 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Patch to cleanup pending dir From: "Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 04:48:59 +0300 (EEST) Mark Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It was more than just that. See: > > http://mla.libertine.org/tmda-workers/200203/msg00075.html We weren't discussing deleting the message upon confirmation/release as TMDA did in the past, but rather deleting it once it on longer fit into DELIVERED_CACHE. --__--__-- _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers End of tmda-workers Digest _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
