[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Yes, very much so. *vigorous nodding*
That's what I figured, thanks for the confirmation. > Ah, so I presume the idea is to save the writer of the template the > hassle of having to do the MIME encoding of header fields? Exactly correct. > I guess another approach might be to provide a tool that takes as > input a "raw" template and produces a template w/ mime-encoded > headers. What advantage would this provide over the other method? It only seems like it would be more confusing/work for the user? _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
