* Jason R. Mastaler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-2002 16:03]: > > I'm making some changes to the default confirm_request.txt template, > and would appreciate your comments if you have any. > > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA). > > Your message attached below is being held because the address > <%(envelope_sender)s> has not been verified.
Good. > To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message > to the following address, or use your mailer's `Reply' feature. I know that this is the way it is currently. It sounds a little awkward to me though. You're splitting up the "send email to the following address" and the address itself, while the easiest (default) action, to just Reply, is stuck in the middle. How about: To release your message for delivery, just use your mailer's "Reply" feature to reply to this message. Alternatively, you can send an empty message to the following address: > %(confirm_accept_address)s My wording might be a little awkward, but I think the order of options for the user is a little clearer this way. Also, I like "Reply" better than `Reply'. It is easier on the eyes and tends to be more what I think an average user would expect to see. Just my $0.02. -jon -- Jon Nathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
