"cmulcahy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> hello all, I am trying to rebuild TMDA as a multi-threaded daemon,
> that is called by light-weight C-clients.  The idea is to avoid the
> overhead of repeated Python invocations & imports and allow TMDA to
> scale to large-numbers of users without break-the-bank hardware.

Do you feel this is better than the ReadyExec method I mentioned? If
so, why?

> I have spent the last few days looking over TMDA's code-base and a
> fair amount of revision will need to be done to adapt it to this
> architecture.

That's what I figured.

> I am planning on buffer-writing the message to a tempfile ( as
> iplemented in my code ) and noting the file offset ( fd.tell() )
> after calling rfc822.Message(fd) to create the headers object.

You should be working from the CVS source, not from a past
release. See http://tmda.net/bugs.html. TMDA (in CVS) no longer uses
rfc822.
_________________________________________________
tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers

Reply via email to