On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:17:39 -0700, "Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just concerned about ignoring an IOError when a user is using > tmda-cgi, but not in "no-su" mode. Okay, well them I'm leaning towards the TMDA_CGI_MODE = "no-su" solution. > Another option is to ditch "no-su" mode because of all the problems > it's causing. Both this, and the issue we are discussing on the > tmda-gui list regarding confirmation URL security come to mind. > > But, there may be additional problems down the road which will have to > be accounted for because "no-su" mode is such a radical departure from > how TMDA works and what it expects. > > Reading the tmda-cgi HOWTO, you seem to already offer a global > multi-user mode, as well as a per-user mode. I think this will cover > practically all potential users, don't you? It's nice to be able to > accommodate off the wall configurations, but not at the expense of > additional frustration, upkeep, etc. It has been a frustrating mode to add, but in retrospect it has been far easier than I ever would have thought. My current thinking is to keep it a little longer. It hasn't brought too much baggage along (well, it brought some, but then I reverted back to the original code several times) so let's not give up on it yet. We can always ditch it later. Gre7g. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
