Tim Legant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do we really need the second column/field in any of the address > databases; text, CDB and DBM?
Probably not. I just added that as a filler lest the slot be "wasted". I agree that things would be simpler and cleaner without it, and no functionality is lost. > On the other hand, users may have lots of these overrides and we may > create significant work for them just because they upgraded TMDA Yeah, but that's nothing new for them <wink>. > Personally, I'd like to see this feature go away That's fine. Any objections? Speak now or forever hold your piece. > perhaps it could be staged. We could support it, but if we find an > override, we could log it to the debug log as deprecated and not > supported in versions after .70, or something like that. Remember that raising _any_ exception will trigger a deferral. Cold turkey baby, with a nod to UPGRADE. Ironically, I'll have to reorganize as I use a single `blacklist' file with mixed instructions (default of drop, with some bounce exceptions). _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
