On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:05, Gre7g Luterman wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:20:38 -0700, Bernard Johnson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm not trying to debate the merits of backgrounding a process or not... :) > > Just trying to make it fit into the current redhat framework for starting > > daemons. The patch I posted included a -f flag to cause it to run > > foreground (current behavior). Perhaps I should change it to have a "-b" > > option (background) for those who wish to use it. > > > > Comments anyone? > > If we're going to incorporate the change, then I would rather see the > -b option so that the default behavior remains. That way there will > be fewer complications in upgrading to a new version with that sort of > addition.
IMHO, we could add both -b and -f options, keeping -b the default, then document it as deprecated and warn the administrator (postmaster?), and finally make either option mandatory. David _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
