Tim Legant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think that leaves you, off the top of my head, with inodes and > device number plus the the three things maildirs have used all > along.
Yup. I'm pretty comfortable with the implementation I just checked in. It checks out conceptually, and stood up to a 10,000 test-message burst just fine. Note, I discussed this with Charles Cazabon first since the original maildir delivery code was taken from getmail. We really didn't agree on the issue, so at this point our maildir delivery code is divergent. He went with microseconds+pid as he feels the problem is more theoretical, and something that should be solved by the MUA. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
