> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Jason R. Mastaler > Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:02 PM
> > The following is my patch to tmda-rfilter to extract the address > > extension from RECIPIENT_HEADER, rather than the EXT or EXTENSION > > environment variables, if RECIPIENT_HEADER is set and the named > > header exists. This makes it easy to use tmda in situations where > > EXT isn't set (eg, behind fetchmail). > This looks benign to me, but I don't use RECIPIENT_HEADER myself. > Could someone who does comment on the proposed change? Would it break > anything in your current setup? I use RECIPIENT_HEADER to get the original recipient for putting in the confirmation messages. When the delivery takes place, my incoming rules are built based on the final address that is used for delivery. For example, a message sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a X-TMDA-Originally-To header set and is then forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm expecting address_extension to be 'other', not empty. How about making this extraction happen only if EXT/EXTENSION isn't set. _______________________ Ron Bickers Logic Etc, Inc. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
