Gre7g Luterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I think I finally have a nice-looking replacement for tmda.net's
> website worked up.

.. I'm not sure if I'm to late to comment on this,

of course it looks nice. But what I dislike on sites like this one is
that you loose the ability to see the whole structure of the
website. The current site at tmda.net shows nicely what docs/... are
available. With the new design one has to click around to get a feel of
what is available. I like to get immediately a feel of what is available
and it assists me to re-navigate to pages where I found usefull stuff.

But don't take that to serious. This is my personal feel about it. Maybe
a site-map could help here. The disadvantage of additional pages are
obvious: greater maintenance overhead.

> Can someone please check it in Opera or whatever else is being used?

w3m looks ok so far. But I haven't checked all of it.

bwolf
-- 
We'll try to make different mistakes this time.
(Larry Wall)

_________________________________________________
tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers

Reply via email to