Tim Legant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gre7g Luterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:11:44 -0700, "Jason R. Mastaler" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > That's fine. I'd hold off anyway, as I think MySQL will be added soon >> > by Cory or Tim. > > So, here we go. > > [ ... etc. ... ] > > Anyhow, that's the idea. I'm curious to hear any feedback before I go > ahead with this -- enhancements, questions, whatever. I'd like to > make sure this works reasonably well before the 1.0 release, which is > looming.
This looks very good to me. I don't see any problems, and my congratulations on a job well done. >> I think we should probably have some sort of MySQL equivilant of >> BARE_APPEND, CONFIRM_APPEND, PENDING_BLACKLIST_APPEND, and/or >> PENDING_DELETE_APPEND, but I held off adding anything as I'm not sure >> how people would want it done. > > The PENDING_* variables might be going away after version 1.0 is > released. Jason might be able to comment more on that, but without > tmda-pending, they really don't serve a purpose. > > The *_APPEND functionality would be nice to have in a database > context. I have an idea how to enhance the database proposal above > which will also allow us to cleanly interface those variables with the > database functionality. It's too much to do before 1.0, however, so > I'll postpone the discussion until later. I understand how there is a lot to do before 1.0, but the DB functionality seems asymmetric without the ability to handle the *_APPEND cases. Perhaps it would be worthwhile for you to present your proposal, in case someone else (maybe even me) would be willing to work on it for the 1.0 release. -- Lloyd Zusman [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
