Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> What about maildir++ compatible pending queues? I thought that item >> was on YOUR list for the 1.0 release. > > I decided to wait until post 1.0 because of the magnitude of this > change. Lots of code will have to be modified if the format of the > pending queue changes such as the Pending module, possibly tmda-cgi, > etc, and it will possibly introduce lots of bugs. > > This is one of the first things I plan to work on in TMDA 1.1 because > I'd also like my pending queue to be a maildir.
OK. Sounds good. >> I know I was a bit hostile towards this idea a few months ago, but >> I've since warmed up to it... > > It might be nice to design things such that the user can choose from a > number of different formats, and or write their own pending queue > module if they have special needs. Some have requested a so called > "sender-based pending queue" where the messages are organized in > subfolders based on sender, so that multiple messages can be released > with one confirmation. I could definately get behind that idea. We can still do that with maildir++ pending queues too. Just make each user a "subdir" of the main 'pending' dir. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
