Ron Bickers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Does TMDA really need to check the body rules on a huge message? Are there any 10MB SPAMs going around? Maybe so, but I've never seen any.
People use TMDA to handle non-SPAM mail as well though.
Right, but are there any manipulations that need to happen to any message that would need the entire body in memory vs. what Jesse is trying to do?
That is, if the body tests are the only thing that need the message in memory, you should still be able to not have to load the whole thing in memory for TMDA to be effective.
Just a thought; I don't really have a problem with how it's working now.
-- Ron Bickers Logic Etc, Inc. _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
