From: "Stephen Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: "Jason R. Mastaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > The bigger problem was that he didn't have his MUA connected to > > tmda-sendmail or tmda-ofmipd (see the headers). > > Yeah - I upgraded sqwebmail and forgot to replace sendit.sh with the TMDA > version. Still, now I'm getting TMDA generate a dated address with an > empty base... Still working on that one!
OK. I've tracked down the source of the failures using X-TMDA in the subject line via sqwebmail. If I type "X-TMDA dated=5d" into the subject line, this gets sent to sendit.sh (and hence tmda-sendmail/tmda-inject) as "Subject: =?utf-8?Q?dated=3D10d?=" - I guess sqwebmail is seeing the = in the message and escaping things out so it won't clash with the = for marking it UTF-8. So, TMDA is thinking I want to use the explicit address "=?utf-8?Q?dated=3D10d?=" So, the question is - is this an issue in TMDA because it isn't parsing/decoding the UTF-8 encoded data, or shouldn't sqwebmail be doing this encoding in the first place? Votes? :-) -- Stephen Warren, Software Engineer, Parama Networks, San Jose, CA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wwwdotorg.org/ _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
