On Tuesday, December 2, 2003, at 17:12, you wrote: > Marcus Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Unfortunately I think its also a "feature" in MS Lookout - if the >> content description field contains a filename Lookout uses it as the >> filename of the mime attachment if it doesnt find one >> elsewhere. Great for getting executables past virus scanners..... > I'm not understanding this. The Content-Description header values > TMDA uses look like 'Confirmation Request', and 'Original Message > Headers'. Outlook should be displaying the parts inline, not marking > them as attachments. Are you saying this isn't the case? No, sorry, I should have been a little clearer - what I meant was I suspect that renattach (or whatever it was called) is defanging the content-description because of this bug in Outlook. Now whether outlook then decides that the inline part is an attachment I dont know (I can easily test this though if you want). Marcus -- Marcus Williams -- http://www.quintic.co.uk Quintic Ltd, 39 Newnham Road, Cambridge, UK _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
