-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 10 March 2004 09:19 pm, Juan Pablo Abuyeres wrote: > I am using the latest version of the stable branch of TMDA. > Eventually, some users complained they couldn't get their mails, and > looking at the debug logs, the problem was that they had no Return-Path > header set. I don't know why, but it was only with a few mails. Almost > every mail had it's Return-Path header. I am using sendmail, with procmail. > Anyway, I patched tmda-rfilter and now it works ok. > When I first setup TMDA I had a similar problem. I too prepared a patch, but it turned out that by running the mail through SpamAssassin, it was stripping out all 'Return-Path' information. Adding the following to my global procmailrc file fixed it without needing a patch. TMDA really needs the 'Return-Path' to come through or bad things will happen.
Regards, Randy procmailrc before - ----------------- :0fw | spamc procmailrc after - ---------------- RETURN_PATH=`/usr/bin/formail -X Return-Path` :0fw | spamc :0fw | /usr/bin/formail -I "$RETURN_PATH" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAT+jFwQGGOFMnewcRAm3JAJsGCgatHZVGdAQxdJNY7Kyh1Ne6OQCcChjZ 3jQXMzE2d9uJNNQmFrDEB4U= =SOUO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
