Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm not looking forward to supporting two separate branches, but I
> think that's what it'll come down to.  Which is too bad, since I
> think we're still a ways away from a true "version 1" feature
> freeze, and it will be nice to include the new features which will
> soon be added to both branches.  That will be a pain.

Indeed.  It's much easier for me since I'm only applying bugfixes to
1.0.x, and that doesn't happen very often anyway.

Do what you have to do to ease to pain, or otherwise the
administrative burden will discourage you from hacking which would be
unfortunate.

> I will also need a new version numbering scheme that somehow still
> maps to the existing periodic table elements...

Or you could choose a new theme for the new branch as I've done with
1.1.x and leave the periodic table elements for the current one.

> I think if the traffic gets worse it would be a good idea.  As it is
> now, I think it's alright, as long as it's okay with you.

No problem.
_________________________________________________
tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers

Reply via email to