on Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:34:56PM -0600, Jim Ramsay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Mark Horn wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 02:05:14PM -0700, Jason R. Mastaler wrote: > >>Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Why not just run SpamAssassin before TMDA? If you did that the only > > things that would ever get to TMDA would be the stuff that got past > > SpamAssassin. Consequently, the only things that could ever be in > > pending would have to have been blessed by SpamAssassin. > > I agree. And I reccomended this to her. I just though I'd post the > original here in case there was some sort of benefit I was unaware of. This would also greatly reduce the tendency of TMDA to generate spam on your behalf by forwarding your spam to the spoofed victim's address. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Yeah, in the future NASA should just submit an Ask Slashdot whenever something goes wrong.. -- seen on, um, some website.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
