on Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:57:46AM -0600, Jason R. Mastaler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Under which, TMDA qualifies. > > Like, what-ever. <valley girl accent>
Like, dude, it's not like I make this shit up myself: http://www.spamfaq.net/spamfighting.shtml#spamfighting_why UBE (Unsolicited Bulk Email) and UCE (Unsolicited Commercial Email) are terms that are often used to describe different types of spam Same source, on C-R: http://www.spamfaq.net/spamfighting.shtml#challenge_response The simplicity of the [challenge-response] solution doesn't reflect the complexity of the real world, and challenge-response has a number of problems: [continuing to identify mailing lists, automated mailings, forged sender, and autoreply bots]. Jason: you're more than welcome to ignore reality. Reality is more than welcome to blacklist your tools and report your users for abuse, if they can't handle the live-wire you're handing them. Presumably you're still moderating my posts. I _love_ people who believe in free and unobstructed flows of information. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? The black hat community is drooling over the possibility of a secure execution environment that would allow applications to run in a secure area which cannot be attached to via debuggers. - Jason Spence, on Palladium aka NGCSB aka "Trusted Computing"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_________________________________________________ tmda-workers mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
