I'm considering making some modifications to the
ACTION_EXPIRED_DATED. I've been getting innundated with SPAMS using
dated addresses that expired over two years ago. I'm assuming that
they've been culled from USENET. My thought was that I would create
two tiers of expiration: EXPIRED and ANCIENT, so that you might have:
ACTION_EXPIRED_DATED = "confirm"
ANCIENT_LIFETIME = 30d
ACTION_ANCIENT_DATED = "bounce"
What would happen is this:
After a dated address expired, but before ANCIENT_LIFETIME,
ACTION_EXPIRED_DATED would occur. After ANCIENT_LIFETIME,
ACTION_ANCIENT_DATED would occur.
Before I do the work on this, I was wondering if anyone (other than
me) thought that this would be a useful feature and if so, what the
probabilities would be of getting it incorporated into the codebase.
Thanks,
- Mark
P.S. I'm glad to see that TMDA has had some new releases. It's too
good a piece of software to stagnate.
_________________________________________________
tmda-workers mailing list ([email protected])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers