|
The current thinking in the MS world is that we
do have what they call "silent attacks" that occur between those that we do
notice. I guess this came about because some MS patients were having
follow up MRIs and they were noticing new/old lesions. That is that they had
lesions they had not documented on MRI previously but they were not necessarily
new or active. I guess they occur between noticeable attacks.
I would think....that these silent attacks are
nothing new in MS but more an artifact of the MRI. We know more about how
MS progresses because of the test. But the disease is still the same as it has
always been.
My neuro says I only need to do a follow-up MRI
when I have new symptoms and feel like I am having a new attack. But the
MS folks now think that you can be having damage that you do not even
notice so regular follow-up MRIs may be a benefit.
I think it boils down to one of those TM/MS
differences/similarities that we like to discuss from time to time.
Sandy in sunny Wisconsin where the rain has
finally stopped.
|
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist sbrassil
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist gbthomas8374
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist sbrassil
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist gbthomas8374
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist Sandy Heidel
- RE: [TMIC] New Neurologist Butcher, Bernie [S&FS]
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist Natalie Boyles
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist JHarper33
- RE: [TMIC] New Neurologist Butcher, Bernie [S&FS]
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist Grace M.
- Re: [TMIC] MRIs BobbyJim
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist BobbyJim
- Re: [TMIC] New Neurologist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
