Dear Jude,<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = 
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
 
I was thinking about your questions comparing the blood vessels to the nervous 
system.  I’m no expert on the nerve connections in the spinal cord, but have 
had a few classes wherein we studied the nerve connections in the brain, so 
maybe I can help a bit.  
 
With the nervous system, each nerve touches AND is touched by other nerves as 
well as connecting with receptors.  So it’s not just like A touches B which 
touches C.  But maybe X, Y, and Z also touch C, and each one may have a 
DIFFERENT input (inhibitory or excitatory, and to varying degrees - meaning 
they may either make the ‘sensation’ stronger or weaker, to put it simply).  
Then on top of that C might be connecting with various other nerves and/or 
sites and its influence is felt by them.  So it’s a MASS of connections, not 
just channeling something (like blood) but having an influence that is a 
COMPOSITE of all the connections made to it.
 
This is why psychotropic meds are ‘iffy’ b/c scientists have only just begun to 
understand some of the connections and to understand just what a certain med 
will do to a certain individual is impossible to predict..  I once said to my 
psychobiology professor that it seems like the main thing I had learned from my 
classes was that we basically don’t know hardly anything (compared to what 
there is to know).  He said, ‘Exactly.  That was one of the main points of the 
class!’
 
So to ‘mess with’ the blood vessels in a ‘cut and paste’ manner only affects a 
system of channeling blood from one place to another, even though it may branch 
off at places.  But with the nerves - which are already different in that they 
often don’t regenerate themselves like other cells do - to mess with them is 
like messing with an electrical system when you have no idea what the different 
connections are or how they’ll be affected.  And of course, that’s if ‘cutting 
and pasting’ didn’t kill them in the first place, which it very likely would.
 
Someone with a more scientific vocabulary than I command could probably explain 
it better, but I think this will convey the general idea.  Hope it helps a bit.
Sally

Reply via email to