You're very right. Thanks for the help!
-Aaron On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Thomas Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is what -t= does. > > Thomas > > On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, 00:24 Aaron U'Ren, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Would you guys be willing to consider making has-session be a strict >> match instead of a fuzzy match? That way it could support checking for >> sessions that match the beginning of the name of another session. For >> instance, this is the current functionality: >> >> tmux new -s foobar >> tmux has-session -t foo >> (returns 0 for success even though foo doesn't actually exist) >> >> -Aaron >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "tmux-users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tmux-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
