I think search-forward/backward should change to use regexps but incremental should not.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019, 20:59 Anindya Mukherjee, <[email protected]> wrote: > Following up, is it desirable to add a new command to do regexp search and > leave the old commands as they are? This would mean > window_copy_regexp_search_... variants of some of the existing functions > and associated UI hookup. > > I was able to fix the line wrapped search issue mentioned above, still > doing character wise comparison, of course. Wondering if it deserves a > separate commit to the existing search infrastructure? > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:29 AM Anindya Mukherjee <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yes my thoughts exactly :D >> >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 8:50 AM Nicholas Marriott < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> If you are adding regex search it would be a perfect opportunity to >>> fix that also :-). >>> >>> On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 16:27, Anindya Mukherjee <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Thanks for clarifying! >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tmux-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tmux-users/CAEdLfcEd%2BepHT0nnvGHvFmGmxg2j5cr5EfukR%3DMiePcynzieFA%40mail.gmail.com.
