Have you had a chance to look at this yet? (Just prodding) It's the vi-B-W-E-cmds.diff one; it introduced "non-whitespace" word-skipping movement commands.
I'd like this patch to get in before I start working on the numeric command-prefix stuff, so I don't have to rework this patch to adjust for those. And also so I can get to work on a patch to allow the user to specify what qualifies as a delimiter for the purposes of movement-by-word. Nicholas Marriott wrote: > I've committed the e diff, I'll look at the other one later on. > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:09:44PM -0800, Micah Cowan wrote: >> New version of the patch. It's now split into two separate diffs, and >> meant to apply after your reworking of window_copy_cursor_next_word >> (which isn't in Sourceforge CVS yet). As you requested, I used a copy of >> that function, rather than introducing a flag (so the enum definition's >> gone, too). >> >> Apologies if I missed anything from our earlier IRC conversation; the >> logs are on my work laptop, and I didn't have access to them when I >> reworked the patches. >> >> "vi-e-cmd.diff" applies first, followed by "vi-B-W-E-cmds.diff". Not >> sure which order my mailer will put them in. >> >> -- >> Micah J. Cowan >> http://micah.cowan.name/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
