Hi On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:36:06PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:25:08PM -0800, Micah Cowan wrote: > > > Now we just need the rotating behaviour of J (see my other > > > post). > > > > Well, you could of course still rig that up through run-shell, and > > some sort of flag-file. But personally, I don't like the rotating > > behavior of J: better to have separate bindings for separate > > modes, so you only have to hit the binding once to get the > > behavior you want (and don't have to figure out what mode you're > > already in). The shell solution strikes me as the most flexible > > solution, since there are many things you just wouldn't think to > > hardcode > > Copying from my other post: > > The other aspect to it is having a key that can shift between the > various options. My idea there is to store the > pass-through-before-pasting command in a (window?) option, and make > a tmux command that takes an option name and a list of possible > values. Every time it's called, it checks for the current value in > the list, and moves to the next one. This would be a fully general > solution that people could use for other things.
This doesn't need a special command, just make set-option and friends rotate though the options if no argument is given, like it does for boolean options. > > (end copy) > > Rather than rotating through option settings, though, it could just > as easily rotate through key bindings. > > So this would be something that would build on top of your shell > solution. > > The nice thing about that solution is that you could do it your way > and I could do it mine. I kind of like the rotating behaviour, > simply because I need at least 3 or 4 different behaviours at > various times, and I don't know that I want to have to remember that > many keys. > > OTOH, the shell solution works as is; I'll have to try it out and > see if it seems worth it to do the rotating thing. > > -Robin > > -- > They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." > And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something > other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz > http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > tmux-users mailing list > tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
