clemens fischer <ino-n...@spotteswoode.dnsalias.org> writes:

> which of emacs/xemacs do you prefer?

I, and most of Freenode's #emacs denizens, use GNU Emacs.  XEmacs seems
to mostly be restricted to those who started with Xemacs 19 rather than
previous or subsequent generations.

> I guess the subject says it all.  My Emacs fu is rusty and I got tired
> of constantly thinking in an ancient, dynamic-scope lisp dialect,
> tweaking my configuration and finding/maintaining oort-gnus versus
> gnus and the like.

If you hate elisp, you may wish to investigate climacs (CL), edwin (MIT
Scheme), jEdit (Java) or yi (Haskell).  They allegedly try to be editors
in the same vein as Emacs, but personally I found the lack of apps,
libraries and general functionality to be enough of a turn off that I'm
stuck with GNU Emacs.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
tmux-users mailing list
tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users

Reply via email to