Yes, I know about these but they are more limited. In any case, I can't reproduce with the window.c fix on either platform.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:40:06AM +0000, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Nicholas Marriott <nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Pretty sure this is use-after-free, which points to w->last still not > > being set properly somewhere. > > > > Can't reproduce on OpenBSD though and its malloc() is much more > > rigorous has much better error checking... > > The MALLOC_CHECK_ and MALLOC_PERTERB_ variables make malloc stricter. > Not sure if OpenBSD's malloc does anything like that by default, but > those can cause crashes on bad pointer manipulation. > > --Ben > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! > Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by > optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the > Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > tmux-users mailing list > tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
