Tiago Resende <trese...@lavabit.com> wrote: > I'm gonna take a guess here. I think urxvt is reporting to support sitm > when it actually doesn't, then screen-256color does its switch between > sitm and smso, then less requests standout but gets italics instead, > which urxvt simply refuses to render. I just reproduced it with xterm > exporting TERM=rxvt-unicode-256color.
Fun. > Can you run > > $ echo '\e[3mitalics\e[m' '\e[7mstandout\e[m' > > in and out of tmux? Both should come out as reverse in tmux , but I'm > guessing italics will come out as regular text (that is, unrendered > italics). If this also happens outside of tmux, then your urxvt really > can't render italics, so if it's repoting \e[3m for sitm in its > terminfo, that would be the actual culprit here. Both do normal "italics" and reverse "standout". > So, could you also attach output of > > $ infocmp $TERM | grep sitm > > ran on urxvt outside of tmux (or just replacing $TERM for what your > urxvt normally uses)? If your urxvt really does not support italics, you > should either get nothing or \e[7m instead. % infocmp rxvt-unicode-256color | grep sitm sgr0=\E[m\E(B, sitm=\E[3m, smacs=\E(0, smam=\E[?7h, --Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users