On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 18:32:40 +0100, Romain Francoise wrote: > Did you test this patch series in emacs editing mode? M-f doesn't behave > as it should, I'd expect it to move the cursor *after* the current word > but it goes back to the last letter. This is inconsistent with the > existing copy-mode implementation (and Emacs, readline, etc).
Honestly no. I'm not familiar with emacs and I'd have just tested that they worked the same as in vi mode. Is M-f the same as 'e' in vi (end of next word)? I suppose that the same logic that copy mode is now doing to differentiate the two could be done there. --Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
