Hi, On 18 April 2010 08:36, Nicholas Marriott <nicholas.marri...@gmail.com> wrote: > Not at the moment, we could add a flag to find-window, although perhaps > some thought needs to be put into how the UI should work for all > commands across sessions - it is clear that switching sessions without > detaching is becoming a common idiom so there might be other ways we can > make it easier.
Yes, I really do mean to drag this two year old thread up again. :) Now that we have a way of displaying a tree of sessions and windows, I'm keen to finally put the finishing pieces in place for solving this problem of commands operating across all sessions -- presumably with an idea that for some commands, they may well need to display information from more than one session. At the moment I can only think of find-window where this is most appropriate -- but I'd rather not just blindly shove a flag in to the find-window command to solve this. I'm assuming as with "-t:+" and "-t:-" to mean relative windows/sessions, we might also want to introduce a "-t:*" idiom (or something like that) to imply all sessions? [1]. That being the case, I'm perfectly happy to prototype this, but worry about the impact a specifier to -t might have on all the existing commands which have never operated across all sessions before. Does anyone have any thoughts? Kindly, -- Thomas Adam [1] And should the logic here be that a list of sessions can be used as in: "-t:1,3,work,play,fun" or is that concept just too wacky? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users