>From what I understood by reading the hook-support email, it performs actions before/after commands are ran. I was thinking of a more generic way to handle session cleanup(eg: server receives SIGTERM).
I will to do it myself if I knew it would be accepted(hopefully before 1.8). However I'm assuming it would only require a few changes in 'session.c' and 'cmd-new-session.c'(handling the new option, adding a field to store the cleanup command in the session struct and running it in 'session_destroy', is that all?) On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Thomas Adam <tho...@xteddy.org> wrote: > On 18 March 2013 03:44, Thiago Padilha <tpadilh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> After reading the code a little bit, I'm guessing this is not possible >> at the moment. >> >> Nicholas, what are your thoughts about adding another option to the >> new-session command, one that would let the user pass a command to be >> executed right before the session is destroyed, eg: > > Wait for hook support. > > -- Thomas Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
