On 12/04/2011 11:22 PM, Leandro Santiago wrote: > Nice! It worked here. > > Are you thinkng in a jsonrpc implementation? Because when I saw you > writing the json serializer i thought "hum.. it's really useful (and > essential) in a jsonrpc library". As cxxtools has already a base to > implement rpc mechanisms, > > There's a lack of jsonrpc libaries for c++ and I think a jsonrpc would > be a big adiction to the library. > > Thanks again I've looked at jsonrpc. The problem is, that it follows a slightly different behavior compared to xmlrpc. Xmlrpc is just a request and reply. In json-rpc both sides must be some kind of servers, which can receive requests at any time. Otherwise it would be a non-brainer to port xmlrpc or binary rpc to json-rpc.
But the difference is also its strength. I have to think about it. The json deserializer will for sure help. Do you have a current use case for json-rpc? Tommi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Tntnet-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tntnet-general
