Am 14.04.2012 12:08, schrieb Julian Wiesener: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 11:08 +0200, Tommi Mäkitalo wrote: >> This is easier to read and edit. >> >> Any comments? > i would consider xml as more convenient, there are many applications > with config in xml and tools generating xml are also widespread and > validation takes alsmost no effort since xmllint is everywhere. > > $ xmllint config.xml > config.xml:14: parser error : expected '>' > <arg>foo</args> > ^ > > > Regards, > Julian > Hi,
I changed now the configuration of tntnet to xml as suggested. You can find the result in svn. If you create a project using tntnet-confg --project=foo then you get a tntnet.xml instead of tntnet.conf now. The man page is not yet updated but the examples are. Tommi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Tntnet-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tntnet-general
