Tommi Mäkitalo <tommi@...> writes: > Hi Artem, > > it is not just a small change to implement that. It needs really > rethinking, how the main loop works.
I like how the libevent asynchronous HTTP processing is implemented, going to try a https://github.com/ellzey/libevhtp server on an alternative port. BTW, it would be very flexible if one could feed accepted sockets into Tntnet, that way one could half-read the socket, read some HTTP headers and delegate the processing to Tntnet when needed (passing it the socket and the characters already read from it). > Another feature request is spdy, which is a extension to http from > google. This also needs rethinking. Would be cool to have a native SPDY in Tntnet for the non-encrypted 6121 SPDY port, when that port gains popularity in SPDY implementations. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Tntnet-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tntnet-general
