Oliver Rath <rath@...> writes:
> I use tntnet at tho moment mainly in conjunction with ipxe http-boot.
> This isnt the "standard" web-server opteration, but tntnet does a really
> good job here (i.e. booting 250MB partedmagic-imagi in <2s). On other
> side he will be used for some other, not so speed-critical things, but i
> dont want to use multiple different web-servers in parallel on my small
> machine.
> 
> Regards
> Oliver

I do not want a chain of web-servers either, that's why
I have to resort to embedding Tntnet ecpp templates in an Apache module,
because Tntnet itself lacks certain webserver features
(like decent reverse proxy and/or support for suspended requests).
Given how much I use AJAX these days I probably wouldn't choose Thtnet
as the webserver, because template generation aren't that important
(hell, I could've embedded PHP for templates, it's fast enough
if used only for the templates and not for the application logic
and most people know it).


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Tntnet-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tntnet-general

Reply via email to