Hi! In the last days I gather some experience with the topic "logging". I'm not sure, but I think cxxtools/log is not all the time the best choice. In an older mail I wrote about my problems with cxxtools/log. The main thing is, that I can`t configure the logging level in C++-Code directly. The only way is the support of a deserializer class and this is not so comfortable. So I had a look on POCO and boost.
The boost-Lib has a logging solution with many features. It`s very well documented: http://boost-log.sourceforge.net/libs/log/doc/html/index.html But the logging part of boost is too young for the most linux distributions and it has not all ready packets. The POCO-Lib has a very feature rich logging solution too and a very fine documentation: * http://pocoproject.org/docs/package-Foundation.Logging-index.html * http://pocoproject.org/slides/110-Logging.pdf And the important point: It is a part of the most linux distributions (i think). Now actually, I want recommend that if the tntnet user need more features for logging tasks/cases, than it is best practice to use POCO logger and not cxxtools. Do you agree with me? best regards Olaf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing Performance Central, a new site from SourceForge and AppDynamics. Performance Central is your source for news, insights, analysis and resources for efficient Application Performance Management. Visit us today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897511&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Tntnet-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tntnet-general
