Hi! I'm a reader of the mailining list from treefrog and Wt too. This mail come from the treefrog mailing list:
> ---------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---------- > Von: AOYAMA Kazuharu <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Datum: 2. November 2013 um 02:21 > Betreff: [tf-user:0235] Web Framework Benchmarks > > FYI. > > Web Framework Benchmarks are published. > Round 7 includes the result of our TreeFrog Framework. > > http://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/ > > There is still plenty room for improvement in TreeFrog.. > > Aoyama > > _______________________________________________ > Treefrog-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/treefrog-user I think this is a interesting thing for Tntnet too. Treefrog is a young(er) project based on Qt. His goal is to make it easy to programming C++ like RubyOnRails. My expectation is that tntnet is quicker than treefrog with our any modification. The reason for this expectation is treefrog has a higher abstraction in his API. But i'm not sure! Olaf -------------------|-------------------|-------------------|-------------------| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Tntnet-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tntnet-general
