Hi, while WebSocket is clearly a desirable feature, which will come more or less for free with HTTP/2 (for current tntnet it requires to much work that will need to be done anyway to have any benefits of HTTP/2 push), NoSQL (whatever db interface you want) is clearly out of scope for tntnet. We have already an external library for SQL (tntdb) and it's a good thing that it's separated. Also i'm covinced that you'll find a C++ client library to whatever DB you like to connect.
Of course that doesn't mean, that if there is no generic, fun to use abstraction, it might make sense to build one on top of cxxtools and develop it under the tntnet umbrella. However, that does not affect tntnet it self and i think the best way of getting one implemented, is starting to implement it. I would support development of such a library if it is generic enough to work with multiple kv-db backends and has only cxxtools and the optional native client library as dependencies (other than posix&STL of course, C++11 migth be fine). Kind Regards, Julian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems _______________________________________________ Tntnet-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tntnet-general
