Hi, I know, that it would be a great feature, but I currently don't have capacity to implement it.
Implementation means complete rethinking of the whole api of tntnet and rewriting major parts. Note that http-2.0 is much more complicated than http-1.1. I don't feel, that http-2.0 is really a good idea. I know about the issues, which are addressed but http is great due of its simplicity. And http-2.0 is not simple at all. But I fear, that we do not come around http-2.0. There is just too much market power behind it. Tommi Am 09.08.2014 10:58, schrieb Oliver Rath: > Hi list, > > do any plans exist for http-2.0 support? Esp. this would be > > - spdy support > - server push support > - hpack compression > - binary framing > - frame multiplexing > > Regards > Oliver > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Tntnet-general mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tntnet-general ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tntnet-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tntnet-general
