Anyone have any more insight on this? I've double and triple checked the
configuration and DNS entries for both machines involved, and they're
configured just fine, and both recieving mail from other machines just fine.

The issue is /specifically/ when sending mail from the machine that hosts
kydance.net to the machine that hosts forgeglobal.com. I've now discovered
that any mail sent from any domain on the kydance.net machine destined for
the forgeglobal.com machine gets it's domain rewritted to kydance.net by the
forgeglobal.com machine, and sent back.

I'm at wits end... Help?

Matthew Walker said:
> Tom Collins said:
>> On Monday, May 19, 2003, at 02:59  PM, Matthew Walker wrote:
>>> However, when I try and send mail from kydance.net to
>>> forgeglobal.com, the mail gets delivered to kydance.net. Looking at the
>>> headers and logs, I can see that the message does in fact get
>>> delivered to
>>> the machine that hosts forgeglobal.com. However, it then gets
>>> delivered to
>>> kydance.net.
>>
>> Check the MX records for each hostname, along with the contents of the
>> following files on each server:
>>
>> /var/qmail/control/locals
> Kydance.net server:
> arsenic.mthmarketing.com
>
> ForgeGlobal.com server:
> lanparty.mthmarketing.com
>
>> /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
> Kydance.net server:
> kydance.net:kydance.net
> kaneq.com:kaneq.com
> slamr.org:slamr.org
> tarynn.net:tarynn.net
> companyrank.com:companyrank.com
> culvercrest.com:culvercrest.com
> vorkink.com:vorkink.com
> witrailblazers.info:witrailblazers.info
> we-rank-media.com:we-rank-media.com
> sacreddragons.com:sacreddragons.com
>
> ForgeGlobal.com server:
> test.com:test.com
> forgeglobal.com:forgeglobal.com
> missionties.com:missionties.com
> lanpartyinc.com:lanpartyinc.com
> thewildernesswoods.com:thewildernesswoods.com
>
>> /var/qmail/control/rcpthosts
> Kydance.net server:
> arsenic.mthmarketing.com
> kydance.net
> kaneq.com
> slamr.org
> tarynn.net
> companyrank.com
> culvercrest.com
> vorkink.com
> witrailblazers.info
> we-rank-media.com
> sacreddragons.com
>
> ForgeGlobal.com server:
> lanparty.mthmarketing.com
> test.com
> forgeglobal.com
> missionties.com
> lanpartyinc.com
> thewildernesswoods.com
>
>> /var/qmail/control/morercpthosts
> Kydance.net server:
> meubox.net
>
> ForgeGlobal.com Server:
> <<empty>>
>
>> /var/qmail/users/assign
>
> Kydance.net server:
> +kydance.net-:kydance.net:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/kydance.net:-::
> +kaneq.com-:kaneq.com:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/kaneq.com:-::
> +slamr.org-:slamr.org:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/slamr.org:-::
> +tarynn.net-:tarynn.net:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/tarynn.net:-::
> +companyrank.com-:companyrank.com:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/companyrank.com:-::
> +culvercrest.com-:culvercrest.com:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/culvercrest.com:-::
> +vorkink.com-:vorkink.com:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/vorkink.com:-::
> +witrailblazers.info-:witrailblazers.info:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/witrailblazers.info:-::
> +we-rank-media.com-:we-rank-media.com:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/we-rank-media.com:-::
> +sacreddragons.com-:sacreddragons.com:1028:408:/home/vpopmail/domains/sacreddragons.com:-::
>
> ForgeGlobal.com Server:
> +test.com-:test.com:89:89:/var/vpopmail/domains/test.com:-::
> +forgeglobal.com-:forgeglobal.com:89:89:/var/vpopmail/domains/forgeglobal.com:-::
> +missionties.com-:missionties.com:89:89:/var/vpopmail/domains/missionties.com:-::
> +lanpartyinc.com-:lanpartyinc.com:89:89:/var/vpopmail/domains/lanpartyinc.com:-::
> +thewildernesswoods.com-:thewildernesswoods.com:89:89:/var/vpopmail/domains/thewildernesswoods.com:-::
>
>>
>> Make sure that forgeglobal.com is only listed on the server hosting it,
>> and kydance.net is likewise, only listed on the server hosting it.
>>
>> Make sure that the address you're sending to isn't an alias to an
>> address at kydance.net.
>
> Definately no aliases. The ForgeGlobal.com domain recieves email just fine
> from everyone but kydance.net addresses. Those get looped back to
> Kydance.net by the ForgeGlobal.com server.
>
> Matthew Walker
>

Reply via email to