RE: [toaster] qmail-ldap conflicts with qmail-toaster?

[Shane Chrisp]

I dont think you will be able to use the patches together without modification. You would need to apply the patch by hand i would think to get them to apply correctly and even then there would be no guarantee that there is no bugs introduced by using the two of them together.    Maybe an alternative to your situation would be to use vpopmail in ldap mode and then qmail-ldap for routing machines?   Shane From: Gustav Yeung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, 1 February 2004 10:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [toaster] qmail-ldap conflicts with qmail-toaster? Hi all,   I have been trying to compile qmail with qmail-ldap and qmail-toaster (0.5-1) on a Fedora machine. It seems that everything went well if I patch qmail with either qmail-ldap OR qmail-toaster, but not both. When I tried to patch the second patch (either qmail-ldap or qmail-toaster) the patching usually failed and I was asked this questions:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail-1.03]# patch -p1 < /factory/factory/FEDORA/qmail/qmail-patches/qmail-ldap-1.03-20040101.patch [EMAIL PROTECTED] qmail-1.03]# patch -p1 < /factory/factory/FEDORA/qmail/qmail-patches/qmail-toaster-0.5-1.patch patching file Makefile Hunk #1 succeeded at 305 with fuzz 2 (offset 169 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 1001 with fuzz 2 (offset 107 lines). Hunk #3 FAILED at 1317. Hunk #4 FAILED at 1415. Hunk #5 FAILED at 1594. Hunk #6 FAILED at 1632. Hunk #7 FAILED at 1681. Hunk #8 FAILED at 1702. Hunk #9 succeeded at 2136 (offset 412 lines). Hunk #10 FAILED at 2598. 7 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej patching file README.auth patching file README.qregex patching file TARGETS The next patch would create the file base64.c, which already exists!  Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] y patching file base64.c Patch attempted to create file base64.c, which already exists. Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file base64.c.rej The next patch would create the file base64.h, which already exists!  Assume -R? [n]   At the end the compilation failed, no matter which answer combination I gave to the patch utility. Is there anyone succeeded in integrating the three together? What kind of response I should give to the questions?   Thanks!   Gustav