i second that, a debian package for this toaster would be great...
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry, but I am not so common with these make things. I looked around, but
> I
> think my debian woody already uses the GNU version of make by default.
> There's no package/command like "gmake".
>
> Notice, that the large qmail patch for netqmail without greylisting works
> fine! It's only the patch with greylisting.
>
> It'll be very great, if there'd be debian-packages of your toaster - it's
> a
> very good thing. If you need a tester with woody - my hand's up :-)
>
> Greets,
>
> Achim Rosenhagen
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 5:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [toaster] stuck with qmail-toaster-0.6-1+greylisting.patch
>
> Achim Rosenhagen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm a little stuck with my fresh toaster installation. I went on the
>> Toaster-Tutorial and everything worked ok.
>> Now I want to add the experimental greylisting-patch to a fresh
>> netqmail
>> 1.05 install on debian woody.
>>
>> On my fresh debian install, patching against netqmail seems to work -
>> but while "make" the following error stops the process:
>>
>> make: *** No rule to make target `maildirquota.c', needed by
>> `maildirquota.o'. Stop.
>
> I saw this on FreeBSD using patch instead of gpatch. But don't know why
> it
> would happen on debian. However, you might try gmake. Please report your
> results. I plan to do extensive testing on debian soon, and will probably
> start maintaining debian packages for this toaster.
>
>> anyone a hint on this?! After that I also want to add the
>> chkuser-patch so that I end up with:
>>
>> 1.) netqmail 1.05
>> 2.) Large Qmail Patch for Netqmail (all the smtp-auth,
>> TLS/SSl...stuff)
>> 3.) chkuser-patch
>> 4.) greylisting patch
>>
>> Since chkuser is also suitable for TMDA, I'd like to continue with
>> TMDA - it's a great tool in my eyes.
>
> There's no reason this should not work together.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill Shupp
>
>
